Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Journal Articles > The Dimensions of the Policy Debate Over Transportation Energy: The Case of Hydrogen in the United States

EmailEmail   PrintPrint  

 
"The Dimensions of the Policy Debate Over Transportation Energy: The Case of Hydrogen in the United States"

"The Dimensions of the Policy Debate Over Transportation Energy: The Case of Hydrogen in the United States"

Journal Article, Energy Policy, volume 36, issue 3, pages 1059-1073

March 2008

Author: Gustavo Collantes, Research Fellow, Energy Technology Innovation Policy

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: Energy Technology Innovation Policy; Environment and Natural Resources; Science, Technology, and Public Policy

 

ABSTRACT

Environmental and politico-strategic concerns have driven the increase in policy activity related to energy that the United States witnessed in the last few years. The nature of the issues at stake and the level of stakeholder involvement result in a highly complex policy debate. The broad concern of this paper is the study of this energy-policy process and the identification of the main policy issues. Specifically, multivariate analysis is applied to data on a wide variety of stakeholders’ policy beliefs and policy preferences to identify the policy dimensions that characterize the debate over energy policy in the United States. The focus is on the policy debate over hydrogen as a transportation fuel, although many results are applicable to the debate over transportation energy at large. The analysis uses a dataset of 502 individuals from 323 different stakeholder organizations obtained via a web-based survey specifically designed for this study.

 

For more information about this publication please contact the ETIP Coordinator at 617-496-5584.

Full text of this publication is available at:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.11.020

For Academic Citation:
Collantes, Gustavo. "The Dimensions of the Policy Debate Over Transportation Energy: The Case of Hydrogen in the United States." Energy Policy 36 3 (March 2008): 1059-1073.

"Policy Options for Reducing Oil Consumption and Greenhouse-Gas Emissions from the U.S. Transportation Sector"
By Kelly Sims Gallagher, Gustavo Collantes, John P. Holdren, Henry Lee and Robert Frosch

Energy Policy Recommendations to the President and the 110th Congress
By John P. Holdren, William K. Reilly, John W. Rowe, Philip Sharp and Jason Grumet

<em>International Security</em>

The Summer 2008 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available. It includes articles by Maria Stephan and Erica Chenoweth, Antonia Chayes, Caitlin Talmadge, and more.

<em>International Security</em>

The Summer 2008 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available. It includes articles by Maria Stephan and Erica Chenoweth, Antonia Chayes, Caitlin Talmadge, and more.

EMAIL UPDATES

Get the latest research on the most important international topics

Sign up to receive updates of the Belfer Center's work on international security, climate change, nuclear issues, the Middle East, or more. Select the topics of your choice.

Human Rights and Wrongs: Slavery, Terror, Genocide

Human Rights and Wrongs explains the persistence of crimes against humanity since the Holocaust...

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past speakers include: Secretary of Energy Sam Bodman, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, and Abdullah S. Jum'ah, president of Saudi Aramco.

Worst of the Worst: Dealing with Repressive and Rogue Nations

"This volume makes an unparalleled contribution to the growing and vital field of measurement and human rights. [The book] offers a useful categorization and assessment of repressive and 'rogue' states, allowing us to measure the extenet of repressive state behavior more accurately. His [Rotberg] work should embolden external critiques and facilitate more transparent and accountable foreign policy."

--Sarah Sewall, Director, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Harvard University