Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Journal Articles > What Terrorists Really Want: Terrorist Motives and Counterterrorism Strategy

EmailEmail   PrintPrint  

 

"What Terrorists Really Want: Terrorist Motives and Counterterrorism Strategy"

Journal Article, International Security, volume 32, issue 4, pages 78-105

Spring 2008

Author: Max Abrahms

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: Quarterly Journal: International Security

 

SUMMARY

What do terrorists want? No question is more fundamental for devising an effective counterterrorism strategy. The international community cannot expect to make terrorism unprofitable and thus scarce without knowing the incentive structure of its practitioners. The strategic model—the dominant paradigm in terrorism studies—posits that terrorists are political utility maximizers. According to this view, individuals resort to terrorism when the expected political gains minus the expected costs outweigh the net expected benefits of alternative forms of protest. The strategic model has widespread currency in the policy community; extant counterterrorism strategies seek to defeat terrorism by reducing its political utility. The most common strategies are to fight terrorism by decreasing its political benefits via a strict no concessions policy; decreasing its prospective political benefits via appeasement; or decreasing its political benefits relative to nonviolence via democracy promotion. Despite its policy relevance, the strategic model has not been tested. This is the first study to comprehensively assess its empirical validity. The actual record of terrorist behavior does not conform to the strategic model’s premise that terrorists are rational actors primarily motivated to achieving political ends. The preponderance of empirical and theoretical evidence is that terrorists are rational people who use terrorism primarily to develop strong affective ties with fellow terrorists. Major revisions in both the dominant paradigm in terrorism studies and the policy community’s basic approach to fighting terrorism are consequently in order.

 

For more information about this publication please contact the IS Editorial Assistant at 617-495-1914.

For Academic Citation:
Max Abrahms. "What Terrorists Really Want: Terrorist Motives and Counterterrorism Strategy." International Security 32 4 (Spring 2008): 78-105.

"The Strategies of Terrorism"
By Andrew Kydd and Barbara Walter

<em>International Security</em>

The Fall 2007 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available. It includes articles by Jerome Slater, Charles Kupchan and Peter Trubowitz, Michael McFaul, and more.

<em>International Security</em>

The Winter 2007/08 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available. It includes articles by Michael Desch, Richard Samuels, Walter Ladwig, and more.

EMAIL UPDATES

Get the latest research on the most important international topics

Sign up to receive updates of the Belfer Center's work on international security, climate change, nuclear issues, the Middle East, or more. Select the topics of your choice.

Human Rights and Wrongs: Slavery, Terror, Genocide

Human Rights and Wrongs explains the persistence of crimes against humanity since the Holocaust...

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past speakers include: Secretary of Energy Sam Bodman, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, and Abdullah S. Jum'ah, president of Saudi Aramco.

Worst of the Worst: Dealing with Repressive and Rogue Nations

"This volume makes an unparalleled contribution to the growing and vital field of measurement and human rights. [The book] offers a useful categorization and assessment of repressive and 'rogue' states, allowing us to measure the extenet of repressive state behavior more accurately. His [Rotberg] work should embolden external critiques and facilitate more transparent and accountable foreign policy."

--Sarah Sewall, Director, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Harvard University