Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Journal Articles > Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia

EmailEmail   PrintPrint Bookmark and Share

 

"Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia"

Journal Article, International Security, volume 34, issue 3, pages 158-196

Winter 2009/10

Author: Victor Cha

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: International Security; Quarterly Journal: International Security

 

SUMMARY

In East Asia the United States cultivated a "hub and spokes" system of discrete, exclusive alliances with the Republic of Korea, the Republic of China, and Japan, a system that was distinct from the multilateral security alliances it preferred in Europe. Bilateralism emerged in East Asia as the dominant security structure because of the "powerplay" rationale behind U.S. postwar planning in the region. "Powerplay" refers to the construction of an asymmetric alliance designed to exert maximum control over the smaller ally's actions. The United States created a series of bilateral alliances in East Asia to contain the Soviet threat, but a congruent rationale was to constrain "rogue allies"- that is, rabidly anticommunist dictators who might start wars for reasons of domestic legitimacy and entrap the United States in an unwanted larger war. Underscoring the U.S. desire to avoid such an outcome was a belief in the domino theory, which held that the fall of one small country in Asia could trigger a chain of countries falling to communism. The administrations of Harry Truman and Dwight Eisenhower calculated that they could best restrain East Asia's pro-West dictators through tight bilateral alliances rather than through a regionwide multilateral mechanism. East Asia's security bilateralism today is therefore a historical artifact of this choice.

 

For more information about this publication please contact the IS Editorial Assistant at 617-495-1914.

For Academic Citation:

Victor D. Cha. "Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. Alliance System in Asia." International Security 34, no. 3 (Winter 2009/10): 158-196.

Bookmark and Share

"Correspondence: Debating American Engagement: The Future of U.S. Grand Strategy"
By Campbell Craig, Benjamin H. Friedman, Brendan Rittenhouse Green, Justin Logan, Stephen Brooks, G. John Ikenberry and William Wohlforth

SUBSCRIBE

Receive email updates on the most pressing topics in science and int'l affairs.

<em>International Security</em>

The Summer 2014 issue of the quarterly journal International Security
is now available!

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past guests include: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, former Vice President Al Gore, and former Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev.