Belfer Center Home > Publications > Articles and Op-Eds > Op-Eds > Bombs Away

EmailEmail   PrintPrint Bookmark and Share

 
"Bombs Away"

The USS John C. Stennis with its air wing on board passes the Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel in Va., Feb. 26, 1998, after leaving Norfolk Naval Base. The USS Stennis is bound for the Persian Gulf.
AP Photo

"Bombs Away"

Op-Ed, The New Republic

February 9, 2010

Author: Matthew Kroenig, Former Research Fellow, Project on Managing the Atom/International Security Program, 2007–2008

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: International Security; Managing the Atom; Science, Technology, and Public Policy

 

"As President Obama begins a push to impose harsher economic sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program, his success will be determined largely by the answer to a single question: Will China and Russia get on board? In order to bite, sanctions must be enforced by the rest of the international community, but, so far, Beijing and Moscow have been reluctant to endorse the toughest penalties advocated by Washington.

Many analysts and policymakers wrongly assume that this reluctance is a function of these countries' economic ties with Iran, or their failure to appreciate the proliferation threat. Last week, for example, Hillary Clinton bluntly challenged China's approach to Tehran, saying, "[W]e understand that right now it seems counterproductive to you to sanction a country from which you get so much of the natural resources your growing economy needs. But think about the longer term implications." The real reason for Beijing and Moscow's obstinacy, however, is much more fundamental, and from Washington's point of view, much more distressing: China and Russia are not particularly threatened by, and may even see a significant upside to, a nuclear-armed Iran.

To understand this point, we must first consider why the United States, China, and Russia—or any other country for that matter—should fear nuclear proliferation. Of course, there are the concerns of accidental nuclear detonation, nuclear terrorism, or even nuclear war. But these are all extremely low probability events. The primary threat of nuclear proliferation is that it constrains the freedom of powerful states to use or threaten to use force abroad...."

Continue reading: http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/bombs-away

 

 

For more information about this publication please contact the Belfer Center Communications Office at 617-495-9858.

Full text of this publication is available at:
http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/bombs-away

For Academic Citation:

Kroenig, Matthew. "Bombs Away." The New Republic, February 9, 2010.

Bookmark and Share

SUBSCRIBE

Receive email updates on the most pressing topics in science and int'l affairs.

<em>International Security</em>

The Fall 2014 Issue of the quarterly journal International Security
is now available!

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past guests include: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, former Vice President Al Gore, and former Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev.