Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Journal Articles > The Dangers of A Nuclear Iran: The Limits of Containment

EmailEmail   PrintPrint Bookmark and Share

 
"The Dangers of A Nuclear Iran: The Limits of Containment"

A view of Iran's unfinished heavy water nuclear facilities near Arak, Jan. 15, 2011. Several international envoys visited this nuclear site as part of a tour that Iran hopes will build support before a new round of talks on its nuclear activities.
AP Photo

"The Dangers of A Nuclear Iran: The Limits of Containment"

Journal Article, Foreign Affairs, pages 66-81

January/February 2011

Authors: Eric S. Edelman, Senior Associate, International Security Program, Andrew F. Krepinevich, Evan Braden Montgomery

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: International Security

 

SUMMARY

Iran's acquisition of a nuclear bomb would upend the Middle East. It is unclear how a nuclear-armed Iran would weigh the costs, benefits, and risks of brinkmanship, meaning that it could be difficult to deter Tehran from attacking the United States' interests or partners in the region.

 

What to do about Iran's nuclear program is one of the most vexing foreign policy challenges confronting the Obama administration. This debate is increasingly characterized both by growing pessimism about whether the international community's diplomatic efforts and economic sanctions can prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons and by guarded optimism that the consequences a nuclear-armed Iran are manageable. Writing in these pages last spring, James Lindsay and Ray Takeyh, both of the Council on Foreign Relations, maintained that the United States could contain Iran even if it developed a nuclear arsenal by establishing clear "redlines" that Tehran would not be allowed to cross without risking some type of retaliation. For example, if Iran used its nuclear weapons, transferred them to a third party, invaded its neighbors, or increased its support for terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah, the United States would be compelled to respond, although the measures it chose to adopt would not be specified in advance. This argument reflects the public position of many senior U.S. and European officials, as well as a number of prominent academics and defense intellectuals.

Continue reading (log in required): http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67162/eric-s-edelman-andrew-f-krepinevich-jr-and-evan-braden-montgomer/the-dangers-of-a-nuclear-iran

 

For more information about this publication please contact the ISP Program Coordinator at 617-496-1981.

Full text of this publication is available at:
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67162/eric-s-edelman-andrew-f-krepinevich
-jr-and-evan-braden-montgomer/the-dangers-of-a-nuclear-iran

For Academic Citation:

Edelman, Eric S., Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr., and Evan Braden Montgomery. "The Dangers of A Nuclear Iran: The Limits of Containment." Foreign Affairs (January/February 2011): 66-81.

Bookmark and Share

<em>International Security</em>

The spring 2013 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available!

SUBSCRIBE

Get the latest research on the most important international topics

Receive email updates on the most pressing topics in international affairs and science.

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past guests include: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, former Vice President Al Gore, and former Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev.