Belfer Center Home > Experts > Michele A. Flournoy > Terrorist Threat Demands Creative Intelligence

EmailEmail   PrintPrint Bookmark and Share

 
"Terrorist Threat Demands Creative Intelligence"

Scene at Ground Zero at 9:03 AM 10th Anniversary of 9/11 Terrorist Attacks, September 11th Memorial at the World Trade Center Site, New York.
(Rex Features via AP Images)

"Terrorist Threat Demands Creative Intelligence"

News, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School

October 19, 2011

Author: Dominic Contreras

 

Listen to a recording of the seminar:


Rolf Mowatt-Larssen, a former director of intelligence and counterintelligence at the Department of Energy, argues that  despite not falling victim to a major terrorist event in the last ten years, the United States must not be complacent in its counter-terrorism efforts.

Mowatt-Larssen said in a seminar at Harvard Kennedy School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs that he  believes the possibility of a major attack is higher in the next ten years than in the preceding decade.

Hosted by Belfer Center Director Graham Allison, Mowatt-Larssen’s talk centered largely on what the former Central Intelligence Agency officer perceives is a deficit in creative thinking regarding counter-terrorism and nuclear security.

“What we need most of all are ideas,” he said. “We need new ideas. We’re living in a world where everything is in tremendous dynamic change, and by simply reflexively applying old methodologies, whether they are defense or intelligence or counter-proliferation…we are sure to fail.”

Mowatt-Larssen, a senior fellow in the Belfer Center, said that creative thinking and the exploitation of dynamic opportunities can allow small groups of focused individuals – like al Qaeda and alleged anthrax attack perpetrator Bruce Ivins– to accomplish that which was previously the domain of states and militaries. Rather than relying on military contingents and weapons of mass destruction, which are easier to track and regulate, terrorists seek what Mowatt-Larssen termed weapons of mass effect, such as  airplanes or inconspicuous chemical substances. This has forced those in the intelligence and national security community to cast aside 60 years of state-to-state-based security thinking and replace it with a new state-to-non-state-actor paradigm.

According to Mowatt-Larssen, effectively combating this threat requires a multilateral approach in which information sharing and cooperation within and among governments are the cornerstone in successful counter-terrorism and counter-proliferation policies. Using this approach, the U.S. and its allies “probably stopped…at least a halfdozen or more specific terrorist attacks…in the 2002-2003 timeline because of the way we shared information,” he said.  “No country is an island…. [and] if you didn’t’ give everything to everybody you couldn’t stop anything.”

He said the belief in the efficacy of intelligence sharing was so strong, especially in the aftermath of 9/11, that in 2003 a decision was made by the U.S. to share, through an intermediary, sensitive information with the Iranian government that a terrorist attack was possibly being planned within its borders. The exact details of this incident remain classified.

Mowatt-Larssen urged the creation of what he called a ‘global intelligence capacity’. “It’s outrageous that we have [an] IAEA that’s got no intelligence capacity, what I call genuine analytical capacity, much less a collection capability,” he said, referencing short-comings in the global institution charged with regulating and safeguarding nuclear material and programs. Unfortunately, he said, “I suspect it will take the next big attack to stimulate this kind of thinking.’’

Mowatt-Larssen urged a “strategic reorientation of how we think of threats and how we think of actors, [and] how we think of risk management.” He emphasized the need to move away from an ad-hoc, reactionary approach to combating terrorism, and move towards a more doctrinal based approach, akin to those used by the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan. For the intelligence community, this lack of a long-term, doctrinal approach “is one of our worst shortcomings.”

That said, the United States and its allies have seen tangible and measurable successes in their fight against extremism, Mowatt-Larssen said. Even before the May 2 raid that killed former al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden, the group’s popularity and effectiveness in the region had been steadily declining. “They’re on the run,” he said, “their narrative is not as appealing in the Middle East because other things [like the Arab Spring] have transcended it or superseded it.”

In conclusion, Mowatt-Larssen reiterated that effectively dealing with terrorism demands “new solutions, new thinking, imagination and most of all taking it seriously as being part of a body of things, not some isolated threat that you have to believe in or not believe in.”

 

For more information about this publication please contact the Belfer Center Communications Office at 617-495-9858.

For Academic Citation:

Contreras, Dominic. "Terrorist Threat Demands Creative Intelligence." News, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, October 19, 2011.

Bookmark and Share

SUBSCRIBE

Receive email updates on the most pressing topics in science and int'l affairs.

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past guests include: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, former Vice President Al Gore, and former Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev.