Belfer Center Home > Publications > Articles and Op-Eds > Op-Eds > Can 120 (Non-Aligned) Countries be Wrong?

EmailEmail   PrintPrint Bookmark and Share

 
"Can 120 (Non-Aligned) Countries be Wrong?"

An expert-level meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement in Tehran, Iran, Aug. 26, 2012. Iran used the weeklong gathering to showcase its global ties and efforts to challenge the West's influence.
AP Photo

"Can 120 (Non-Aligned) Countries be Wrong?"

Op-Ed, The Huffington Post

September 4, 2012

Author: Charles G. Cogan, Associate, International Security Program

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: International Security

 

During the Cold War, we used to joke about the Non-Aligned Movement, because it really wasn't non-aligned. On the contrary, it was aligned against the West and against colonialism. It wasn't really, as it claimed, non-aligned as between East and West, as between the Communist world and the so-called Free World, because it contained, of all things, Communist China!

Its heavies, from its founding in Bandung, Indonesia, in 1955, were Nehru, Nasser, Tito, Sukarno and Chou-en-lai, none of whom could be mistaken as friends of the West.

Not particularly relevant during the Cold War, what possibly can the Non-Aligned Movement represent today? The Cold War is over. Has the movement outlived its usefulness? The answer is no, despite the Movement's outmoded Cold War origins. It serves as a rallying point for all those countries who want to push back against what they see as the dominating attitudes and policies of the United States, and to a lesser degree, the West in general.

For example: as if to demonstrate the problem of the legitimacy of a preventive attack against Iran, the Movement's 120 members, meeting in Tehran on August 30, unanimously supported Iran's nuclear energy program and criticized American-sponsored attempts to use sanctions against Iran.

Much as it is tempting to deride the Non-Aligned Movement as an anachronism, we should ponder the symbolic implications of this expression of disapproval of a preventive attack on Iran by representatives of 120 of the world's countries, meeting in Tehran in the presence of the United Nations Secretary-General.

Although the meeting was not an unalloyed success for Tehran, with the Sunni members unwilling to give an expression of support to the Bashar al-Assad regime in Syria, the Iranians pulled out all the stops in organizing the conference, including the display of the calcinated vehicles of three assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists.

 

For more information about this publication please contact the Belfer Center Communications Office at 617-495-9858.

Full text of this publication is available at:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-charles-g-cogan/can-120-nonaligned-countr_b_185
0432.html

For Academic Citation:

Cogan, Dr. Charles G. "Can 120 (Non-Aligned) Countries be Wrong?." The Huffington Post, September 4, 2012.

Bookmark and Share

<em>International Security</em>

The spring 2013 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available!

SUBSCRIBE

Get the latest research on the most important international topics

Receive email updates on the most pressing topics in international affairs and science.

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past guests include: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, former Vice President Al Gore, and former Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev.