Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Reports > Understanding the IAEA's Mandate in Iran: Avoiding Misinterpretations

EmailEmail   PrintPrint Bookmark and Share

 
<em>Understanding the IAEA's Mandate in Iran: Avoiding Misinterpretations</em>

IAEA Director Yukiya Amano
AP Images

Understanding the IAEA's Mandate in Iran: Avoiding Misinterpretations

Report, Institute for Science and International Security

November 27, 2012

Authors: Olli Heinonen, Senior Fellow, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, David Albright, Orde Kittrie

 

Much attention has focused on Iran's advancing nuclear program, on the peace and security concerns which that program has raised, and on the international policy debate over how to respond to that program. Far less attention has been paid to the various legal-sounding arguments used by Iran and a few academics to call into question the mandate of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to investigate and make determinations about actual or suspected violations of Iran’s legal obligations. Although arguments used by Iran and these academics to undermine the legitimacy of IAEA activities regarding Iran are patently false, they are nevertheless dangerous to both current and future nonproliferation efforts. Unless these arguments are clearly countered, and their fallaciousness clearly demonstrated for all the world to see, these arguments may decrease the chances of Iran agreeing to comply with its international legal obligations, could provide a fig leaf to those countries disinclined to hold Iran accountable, and might undercut the IAEA's and the United Nations Security Council's potentially pivotal roles in facilitating a peaceful resolution to disputes over the nuclear programs of Iran and future proliferators.

It is in that light that we have chosen to address the dangerous claim published on September 13, 2012 by Daniel Joyner, a law professor at the University of Alabama, that the IAEA has exceeded its legal mandate in applying safeguards in Iran in accordance with a comprehensive safeguards agreement (CSA) under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). In view of the importance of the IAEA's activities regarding Iran, the persistent efforts by Iran to call into question the legitimacy of those IAEA activities, and our concern to ensure that there is no misunderstanding as to the agency's mandates, we are writing to discuss those mandates and explain why Joyner is incorrect.

Click the attachment below to view the full text of this report.

 

For more information about this publication please contact the Belfer Center Communications Office at 617-495-9858.

For Academic Citation:

David Albright, Olli Heinonen, and Orde Kittrie. Understanding the IAEA's Mandate in Iran: Avoiding Misinterpretations. Report for Institute for Science and International Security, 11 2012.

Bookmark and Share

"Iran Plays Games with the Geneva Deal"
By Olli Heinonen and Orde Kittrie

"A North Korean in Iran"
By Olli Heinonen and Simon Henderson

SUBSCRIBE

Receive email updates on the most pressing topics in science and int'l affairs.

<em>International Security</em>

The Spring 2014 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available!

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past guests include: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, former Vice President Al Gore, and former Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev.