Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Journal Articles > Expert Judgments about RD&D and the Future of Nuclear Energy

EmailEmail   PrintPrint Bookmark and Share

 
"Expert Judgments about RD&D and the Future of Nuclear Energy"

Nuclear Fuel Rod Assembly
NEAMS/DOE Photo

"Expert Judgments about RD&D and the Future of Nuclear Energy"

Journal Article, Environmental Science and Technology, volume 46, issue 12, page 11497–11504

2012

Authors: Laura Diaz Anadon, Assistant Professor of Public Policy; Associate Director, Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program; Co-PI, Energy Technology Innovation Policy research group, Valentina Bosetti, Matthew Bunn, Professor of Practice; Co-Principal Investigator, Project on Managing the Atom, Michela Catenacci, Audrey Lee, Former Research Fellow, Energy Technology Innovation Policy research group, 2009–2011

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: Energy Technology Innovation Policy; Environment and Natural Resources; Managing the Atom; Science, Technology, and Public Policy

 

ABSTRACT

Probabilistic estimates of the cost and performance of future nuclear energy systems under different scenarios of government research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) spending were obtained from 30 U.S. and 30 European nuclear technology experts. We used a novel elicitation approach which combined individual and group elicitation. With no change from current RD&D funding levels, experts on average expected current (Gen. III/III+) designs to be somewhat more expensive in 2030 than they were in 2010, and they expected the next generation of designs (Gen. IV) to be more expensive still as of 2030. Projected costs of proposed small modular reactors (SMRs) were similar to those of Gen. IV systems. The experts almost unanimously recommended large increases in government support for nuclear RD&D (generally 2–3 times current spending). The majority expected that such RD&D would have only a modest effect on cost, but would improve performance in other areas, such as safety, waste management, and uranium resource utilization. The U.S. and E.U. experts were in relative agreement regarding how government RD&D funds should be allocated, placing particular focus on very high temperature reactors, sodium-cooled fast reactors, fuels and materials, and fuel cycle technologies.

 

Continue reading (log in may be required): http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es300612c

 

For more information about this publication please contact the ETIP Coordinator at 617-496-5584.

Full text of this publication is available at:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es300612c

For Academic Citation:

Anadon, Laura D., Valentina Bosetti, Matthew Bunn, Michela Catenacci, and Audrey Lee. "Expert Judgments about RD&D and the Future of Nuclear Energy." Environmental Science and Technology 46, no. 12 (2012): 11497–11504.

Bookmark and Share

"Research, Development, and Demonstration for the Future of Nuclear Energy"
By Laura Diaz Anadon, Valentina Bosetti, Matthew Bunn, Michela Catenacci and Audrey Lee

Transforming U.S. Energy Innovation
By Laura Diaz Anadon, Matthew Bunn, Gabe Chan, Melissa Chan, Charles Jones, Ruud Kempener, Audrey Lee, Nathaniel Logar and Venkatesh "Venky" Narayanamurti

SUBSCRIBE

Receive email updates on the most pressing topics in science and int'l affairs.

<em>International Security</em>

The Summer 2014 issue of the quarterly journal International Security
is now available!

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past guests include: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, former Vice President Al Gore, and former Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev.