Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Journal Articles > Don't Come Home, America: The Case against Retrenchment

EmailEmail   PrintPrint Bookmark and Share

 

"Don't Come Home, America: The Case against Retrenchment"

Journal Article, International Security, volume 37, issue 3, page 7–51

Winter 2012/13

Authors: Stephen Brooks, Former Fellow, International Security Program, 2003-2004, G. John Ikenberry, William Wohlforth, Editorial Board Member, Quarterly Journal: International Security

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: Quarterly Journal: International Security

 

SUMMARY

After sixty-five years of pursuing a grand strategy of global leadership—nearly a third of which transpired without a peer great power rival—has the time come for the United States to switch to a strategy of retrenchment? According to most security studies scholars who write on the future of U.S. grand strategy, the answer is an unambiguous yes: they argue that the United States should curtail or eliminate its overseas military presence, abolish or dramatically reduce its global security commitments, and minimize or eschew efforts to foster and lead the liberal institutional order. Thus far, the arguments for retrenchment have gone largely unanswered by international relations scholars. An evaluation of these arguments requires a systematic analysis that directly assesses the core claim of retrenchment advocates that the current “deep engagement” grand strategy is not in the national interests of the United States. This analysis shows that advocates of retrenchment radically overestimate the costs of deep engagement and underestimate its benefits. We conclude that the fundamental choice to retain a grand strategy of deep engagement after the Cold War is just what the preponderance of international relations scholarship would expect a rational, self-interested leading power in America’s position to do.

 

Read Colin Dueck's review of this article on ISSF.

Read another review of this article in The Wilson Quarterly.

 

For more information about this publication please contact the IS Editorial Assistant at 617-495-1914.

For Academic Citation:

Stephen G. Brooks, G. John Ikenberry, and William C. Wohlforth. "Don't Come Home, America: The Case against Retrenchment." International Security 37, no. 3 (Winter 2012/13): 7–51.

Bookmark and Share

"Correspondence: Debating American Engagement: The Future of U.S. Grand Strategy"
By Campbell Craig, Benjamin H. Friedman, Brendan Rittenhouse Green, Justin Logan, Stephen Brooks, G. John Ikenberry and William Wohlforth

"Why America Should Not Retrench"
By Stephen Brooks, G. John Ikenberry and William Wohlforth

"Correspondence: The Profitability of Primacy"
By Richard W. Maass, Carla Norrlof and Daniel W. Drezner

SUBSCRIBE

Receive email updates on the most pressing topics in science and int'l affairs.

<em>International Security</em>

The Spring 2014 issue of the quarterly journal International Security is now available!

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past guests include: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, former Vice President Al Gore, and former Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev.