Belfer Center Home > Publications > Academic Papers & Reports > Discussion Papers > The Discovery-Invention Cycle: Bridging the Basic/Applied Dichotomy

EmailEmail   PrintPrint Bookmark and Share

 
"The Discovery-Invention Cycle: Bridging the Basic/Applied Dichotomy"

"The Discovery-Invention Cycle: Bridging the Basic/Applied Dichotomy"

Discussion Paper 2013-02, Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School

February 2013

Authors: Venkatesh "Venky" Narayanamurti, Benjamin Peirce Professor of Technology and Public Policy; Professor of Physics, Harvard; Director, Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program; Co-Principal Investigator, Energy Technology Innovation Policy research group, Tolu Odumosu, Associate, Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program/Project on Technology, Security, and Conflict in the Cyber Age, Lee Vinsel

Belfer Center Programs or Projects: The Cyber Project; Science, Technology, and Public Policy

 

ABSTRACT

Since the Second World War U.S. science policy has, in large measure, been driven by Vannevar Bush's Science, The Endless Frontier. Bush's separation of research into "basic" and "applied" domains has been enshrined as status quo in much of U.S. science and technology policy over the past seven decades. However, the relationship of science and technology research to economic and societal wellbeing requires a coherent national innovation policy to bridge this divide. Much of the debate over the categories of basic and applied centers on what the appropriate federal role is in innovation. Bush argued successfully that funding "basic" research was a necessary role for government, with the implication that "applied" research should be left to the auspices of markets except where necessary to the public interest (defense and health "applied research" for example). Nevertheless, the original distinction is an artificial one and this is perhaps the time that policy discussions are moved beyond a simple focus on the stated goals of research to more productive considerations of a holistic view of the research enterprise.

In this paper we hope to provide an alternative point of view. By examining both the evolution of the famous "linear model of innovation" — which holds that scientific research precedes technological innovation — and the problematic description of engineering being "applied science" we seek to challenge the existing dichotomies between basic / applied research, science and engineering, tracing how knowledge travels between different knowledge domains through a case study of a selected group of Nobel Prizes in physics.

 

For more information about this publication please contact the STPP Web Manager at 617-496-1981.

For Academic Citation:

Narayanamurti, Venkatesh, Tolu Odumosu, and Lee Vinsel. "The Discovery-Invention Cycle: Bridging the Basic/Applied Dichotomy." Discussion Paper 2013-02, Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, February 2013.

Bookmark and Share

"Engineering the Future"
By Calestous Juma

"Transforming U.S. Energy Innovation"
By Laura Diaz Anadon, Matthew Bunn, Gabe Chan, Melissa Chan, Charles Jones, Ruud Kempener, Audrey Lee, Nathaniel Logar and Venkatesh "Venky" Narayanamurti

"RIP: The Basic/Applied Research Dichotomy"
By Venkatesh "Venky" Narayanamurti, Tolu Odumosu and Lee Vinsel

"Transforming Energy Innovation"
By Venkatesh "Venky" Narayanamurti, Laura Diaz Anadon and Ambuj D. Sagar

SUBSCRIBE

Receive email updates on the most pressing topics in science and int'l affairs.

<em>International Security</em>

The Fall 2014 Issue of the quarterly journal International Security
is now available!

Events Calendar

We host a busy schedule of events throughout the fall, winter and spring. Past guests include: UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, former Vice President Al Gore, and former Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev.